Patients with coronary disease fail observation status at higher rates than patients without coronary disease.

  • Madsen T
  • Bossart P
  • Bledsoe J
 et al. 
  • 2


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A


    Citations of this article.


Background: Few studies have evaluated emergency department (ED) observation unit chest pain protocols for optimal patient characteristics and admission rates. At our 35 000-visits/y ED, we implemented a chest pain protocol for our observation unit that allowed emergency physicians to admit patients with known coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of all observation unit patients admitted under the chest pain protocol from April 1, 2006, to May 31, 2007. We compared the outcomes of patients who had a history of CAD with those who did not. Results: Five hundred thirty-one patients were admitted to the observation unit under the chest pain protocol for the 14-month study period. Of these patients, 125 (23.5%) had a history of CAD. Patients with a history of CAD had a higher inpatient admission rate ( 24% vs 8.6%; P < .001), higher rate of a positive stress test or positive coronary computed tomographic scan (32.3% vs 6.9%; P < .001), a higher rate of cardiac catheterization (12% vs 5.9%; P = .02), and a higher rate of stent placement or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) (7.2% vs 2.2%; P = .007). In multivariate analysis, patient history of CAD was an independent predictor of hospital admission (P = .005) and stent placement or CABG (P = .030). Conclusion: Patients with known CAD who were admitted to the ED observation unit failed observation status (ie, required hospitalization) and had higher rates of positive testing than those without CAD. © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in


  • T Madsen

  • P Bossart

  • J Bledsoe

  • K Bernhisel

  • M Cheng

  • T Mataoa

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free