• Henri J
  • Côté L
  • Cucumel G
 et al. 
  • 1


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A


    Citations of this article.


The aim of this paper is to bridge the gap between the organizational effectiveness (OE) models developed in the field of organizational theory and the performance measurement models presented within the management accounting literature. The specific evolution of these two complementary streams of research stemming from two different fields of research are reconciled and integrated by analyzing their convergences and divergences. As a response to theoretical and practical pressures, the evolution of OE models reflects a construct perspective, while the evolution of performance measurement models mirrors a process perspective. Performance measurement models have moved from a cybernetic view whereby performance measurement was based mainly on financial measures and considered as a component of the planning and control cycle to a holistic view based on multiple nonfinancial measures where performance measurement acts as an independent process included in a broader set of activities. This paper contributes to the performance measurement literature by establishing the origins of the performance measurement models and by shedding light on unexplored fertile areas of future research.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

There are no full text links


  • Jean-François Henri

  • Louise Côté

  • Guy Cucumel

  • Maurice Gosselin

  • Zahirul Hoque

  • Jacques Maurice

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free