Pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of cefoxitin in obesity: implications for risk of surgical site infection

  • Toma O
  • Suntrup P
  • Stefanescu A
 et al. 
  • 3

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a significant risk factor for surgical site infections (SSIs), for poorly understood reasons. SSIs are a major cause of morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, and increased health care cost. Drug disposition in general is frequently altered in the obese. Preoperative antibiotic administration, achieving adequate tissue concentrations at the time of incision, is an essential strategy to prevent SSIs. Nonetheless, there is little information regarding antibiotic concentrations in obese surgical patients. This investigation tested the hypothesis that the prophylactic antibiotic cefoxitin may have delayed and/or diminished tissue penetration in the obese. METHODS: Plasma and tissue concentrations of cefoxitin were determined in obese patients undergoing abdominal and pelvic surgery (body mass index 43 +/- 10 kg/m(2), n = 14, 2 g cefoxitin) and in normal-weight patients and healthy volunteers (body mass index 20 +/- 2 kg/m(2), n = 13, 1 g cefoxitin). Tissue concentrations were measured using a microdialysis probe in the subcutaneous layer of the abdomen, and in adipose tissue excised at the time of incision and wound closure. RESULTS: Plasma concentrations and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) were approximately 2-fold higher in the obese patients because of the 2-fold-higher dose. Dose-normalized concentrations were higher, although AUCs were not significantly different. Measured and dose-normalized subcutaneous cefoxitin concentrations and AUCs in the obese patients were significantly lower than in the normal-weight subjects. There was an inverse relationship between cefoxitin tissue penetration (AUC(tissue)/AUC(plasma) ratio) and body mass index. Tissue penetration was substantially lower in the obese patients (0.08 +/- 0.07 vs 0.37 +/- 0.26, P < 0.05). Adipose tissue cefoxitin concentrations in obese patients were only 7.8 +/- 7.3 and 2.7 +/- 1.4 mug/g, respectively, at incision and closure, below the minimum inhibitory concentration of 8 and 16 mug/mL, respectively, for aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms. CONCLUSION: Obese surgical patients have impaired tissue penetration of the prophylactic antibiotic cefoxitin, and inadequate tissue concentrations despite increased clinical dose (2 g). Inadequate tissue antibiotic concentrations may be a factor in the increased risk of SSIs in obese surgical patients. Additional studies are needed to define doses achieving adequate tissue concentrations.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Abdomen/surgery
  • Adipose Tissue/metabolism/surgery
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage/bloo
  • Antibiotic Prophylaxis
  • Area Under Curve
  • Body Mass Index
  • Case-Control Studies
  • Cefoxitin/administration & dosage/blood/pharmacoki
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Microbial Sensitivity Tests
  • Microdialysis
  • Middle Aged
  • Missouri
  • Obesity/complications/diagnosis/metabolism
  • Pelvis/surgery
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Factors
  • Surgical Procedures, Operative/adverse effects
  • Surgical Wound Infection/etiology/metabolism/preve
  • Tissue Distribution
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Young Adult

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Authors

  • O Toma

  • P Suntrup

  • A Stefanescu

  • A London

  • M Mutch

  • E Kharasch

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free