Phylogenomics: the beginning of incongruence?

  • Jeffroy O
  • Brinkmann H
  • Delsuc F
 et al. 
  • 494

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 328

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Until recently, molecular phylogenies based on a single or few orthologous genes often yielded contradictory results. Using multiple genes in a large concatenation was proposed to end these incongruences. Here we show that single-gene phylogenies often produce incongruences, albeit ones lacking statistically significant support. By contrast, the use of different tree reconstruction methods on different partitions of the concatenated supergene leads to well-resolved, but real (i.e. statistically significant) incongruences. Gathering a large amount of data is not sufficient to produce reliable trees, given the current limitation of tree reconstruction methods, especially when the quality of data is poor. We propose that selecting only data that contain minimal nonphylogenetic signals takes full advantage of phylogenomics and markedly reduces incongruence. Crown Copyright © 2006.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Olivier Jeffroy

  • Henner Brinkmann

  • Frédéric Delsuc

  • Hervé Philippe

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free