PLS and dimension reduction for classification

  • Liu Y
  • Rayens W
  • 39


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 34


    Citations of this article.


Barker and Rayens (J Chemometrics 17:166-173, 2003) offered convincing arguments that partial least squares (PLS) is to be preferred over principal components analysis (PCA) when discrimination is the goal and dimension reduction is required, since at least with PLS as the dimension reduction tool, information involving group separation is directly involved in the structure extraction. In this paper the basic results in Barker and Rayens (J Chemometrics 17:166-173, 2003) are reviewed and some of their ideas and comparisons are illustrated on a real data set, something which Barker and Rayens did not do. More importantly, new results are introduced, including a formal proof for the superiority of PLS over PCA in the two-group case, as well as new connections between PLS for discrimination and an extended class of PLS-like techniques known as "oriented PLS" (OrPLS). In the latter case, a particularly simple subclass of OrPLS procedures, when used to achieve the dimension reduction, is shown to always produce a lower misclassification rate than when "ordinary" PLS is used for the same purpose. © Springer-Verlag 2007.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Linear discriminant analysis
  • Misclassification rates
  • Principal components
  • Ridge regression
  • Shrinkage estimation

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Yushu Liu

  • William Rayens

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free