Polysilicate equilibria in concentrated sodium silicate solutions

95Citations
Citations of this article
70Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Polysilicate equilibria in concentrated sodium silicate solutions have been studied using potentiometric (glass electrode) and 29 Si n.m.r. methods. Experimental data cover the ranges: 11.36 ≤ pH ≤ 14.09, 2.4 ≤ [Na + ] tot /mol dm -3 ≤ 9.6, 2.1 ≤ [Si] tot /mol dm -3 ≤ 9.3 with a variation of SiO 2 /Na 2 O between 3.3 and 1.0. From available pH and n.m.r. data an equilibrium model is derived describing polymerization and protonation of silicate species in these water-glass solutions. With SiO 2 /Na 2 O = 1.0, i.e. in the most alkaline solutions (pH ≳ 13), dimeric as well as cyclic forms of tri- and tetra-meric silicate species predominate. At higher SiO 2 /Na 2 O, polymerization leads to the formation of polysilicate species containing branching groups with nuclearities 6-8 dominating. With SiO 2 /Na 2 O ≳ 3.3, i.e. close to the precipitation boundary of amorphous silica, cage-like polysilicate species dominate. The average charge per Si atom for the different polysilicate species varied between -2 in the most alkaline solutions down to -0.5 close to the precipitation boundary. The buffering capacity of the different water-glass solutions was found to decrease with increasing SiO 2 /Na 2 O. The change in the different formation constants (log β pq) due to variation in total Si and SiO 2 /Na 2 O, was found to be linear with respect to the Na + concentration, i.e. log β pq = log β° pq + k[Na + ]. Distribution diagrams describing speciation and equilibria in water-glass solutions of different SiO 2 /Na 2 O and total Si concentrations are derived using the computer program SOLGASWATER.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Svensson, I. L., Sjöberg, S., & Öhman, L. O. (1986). Polysilicate equilibria in concentrated sodium silicate solutions. Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions 1: Physical Chemistry in Condensed Phases, 82(12), 3635–3646. https://doi.org/10.1039/F19868203635

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free