Is pornography “speech”?

  • Koppelman A
  • 9

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 5

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Reviews the theories of John Finnis and Frederick Schauer on why pornography should not be protected under the Constitution of the United States First Amendment, challenges their conclusions and suggests why their views are unsustainable.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Andrew Koppelman

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free