Postema: Philosophy and the Law of Torts

  • William L
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

When accidents occur and people suffer injuries, who ought to bear the loss? Tort law offers a complex set of rules to answer this question, but up to now philosophers have offered little by way of analysis of these rules. In eight essays commissioned for this volume, leading legal theorists examine the philosophical foundations of tort law. Amongst the questions they address are the following: how are the notions at the core of tort practice (such as responsibility, fault, negligence, due care, and duty to repair) to be understood? Is an explanation based on a conception of justice feasible? How are concerns of distributive and corrective justice related? What amounts to an adequate explanation of tort law? This collection will be of interest to professionals and advanced students working in philosophy of law, social theory, political theory, and law, as well as anyone seeking a better understanding of tort law.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

William, L. (2004). Postema: Philosophy and the Law of Torts. The Modern Law Review, 67(4), 709–713. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2004.507_4.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free