Preliminary Analyses of Three Measures of Grace: Can They be Unified?

  • Bufford R
  • Blackburn A
  • Sisemore T
 et al. 
  • 5


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 4


    Citations of this article.


Grace is an interesting and potentially significant domain within positive psychology, but remains largely neglected. The present study examined the relationships among three known grace scales to evaluate the potential for creating a stronger single measure. It also explored their relationships to several other religious/spiritual measures to examine whether the three scales are measuring the same construct, to explore the implications for our understanding of grace, and to provide insights for further study. The three measures had moderately strong correlations with each other (r= .55 to .66), had similar relationships to other measures of religion/spirituality, and had distinct relationships to measures of psychological health and distress. This suggested that the three scales measure somewhat different constructs. Two grace scales showed significant negative skew, indicating ceiling problems. Differences in the underlying grace constructs, contamination by other concepts, or an underlying multidimensional structure for grace could account for these differences. Further study should better articulate the constructs underlying grace measures, address problems related to negative skew in responses, and clarify whether grace is multidimensional. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Author-supplied keywords

  • distress (psychology)
  • grace (theology)
  • mental health -- religious aspects
  • positive psychology
  • spirituality -- christianity

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

  • PUI: 617717710
  • SGR: 85012106359
  • SCOPUS: 2-s2.0-85012106359
  • ISSN: 0091-6471


  • Rodger K Bufford

  • Amanda M Blackburn

  • Timothy A Sisemore

  • Rodney L Bassett

  • Rodney L. Bufford, Rodger K.Blackburn, Amanda M.Sisemore, Timothy A.Bassett

  • Rodger K Bufford

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free