The Price of Racial Bias: Intergroup Negotiations in the Ultimatum Game

86Citations
Citations of this article
224Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Existing stereotypes about Black Americans may influence perceptions of intent during financial negotiations. In this study, we explored whether the influence of race on economic decisions extends to choices that are costly to the decision maker. We investigated whether racial group membership contributes to differential likelihood of rejection of objectively equal unfair monetary offers. In the Ultimatum Game, players accept or reject proposed splits of money. Players keep accepted splits, but if a player rejects an offer, both the player and the proposer receive nothing. We found that participants accepted more offers and lower offer amounts from White proposers than from Black proposers, and that this pattern was accentuated for participants with higher implicit race bias. These findings indicate that participants are willing to discriminate against Black proposers even at a cost to their own financial gain. © The Author(s) 2013.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kubota, J. T., Li, J., Bar-David, E., Banaji, M. R., & Phelps, E. A. (2013). The Price of Racial Bias: Intergroup Negotiations in the Ultimatum Game. Psychological Science, 24(12), 2498–2504. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613496435

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free