Journal article

Primary and secondary sources of formaldehyde in urban atmospheres: Houston Texas region

Parrish D, Ryerson T, Mellqvist J, Johansson J, Fried A, Richter D, Walega J, Washenfelder R, De Gouw J, Peischl J, Aikin K, McKeen S, Frost G, Fehsenfeld F, Herndon S ...see all

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, vol. 12, issue 7 (2012) pp. 3273-3288

  • 50


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 47


    Citations of this article.
Sign in to save reference


We evaluate the rates of secondary production and primary emission of formaldehyde (CH sub(2)O) from petrochemical industrial facilities and on-road vehicles in the Houston Texas region. This evaluation is based upon ambient measurements collected during field studies in 2000, 2006 and 2009. The predominant CH sub(2)O source (92 +/- 4% of total) is secondary production formed during the atmospheric oxidation of highly reactive volatile organic compounds (HRVOCs) emitted from the petrochemical facilities. Smaller contributions are primary emissions from these facilities (4 +/- 2%), and secondary production ( similar to 3%) and primary emissions ( similar to 1%) from vehicles. The primary emissions from both sectors are well quantified by current emission inventories. Since secondary production dominates, control efforts directed at primary CH sub(2)O emissions cannot address the large majority of CH sub(2)O sources in the Houston area, although there may still be a role for such efforts. Ongoing efforts to control alkene emissions from the petrochemical facilities, as well as volatile organic compound emissions from the motor vehicle fleet, will effectively reduce the CH sub(2)O concentrations in the Houston region. We do not address other emission sectors, such as off-road mobile sources or secondary formation from biogenic hydrocarbons. Previous analyses based on correlations between ambient concentrations of CH sub(2)O and various marker species have suggested much larger primary emissions of CH sub(2)O, but those results neglect confounding effects of dilution and loss processes, and do not demonstrate the causes of the observed correlations. Similar problems must be suspected in any source apportionment analysis of secondary species based upon correlations of ambient concentrations of pollutants.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text


Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free