Production, usage, and comprehension in animal vocalizations

  • Seyfarth R
  • Cheney D
  • 198

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 71

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

In this review, we place equal emphasis on production, usage, and comprehension because these components of communication may exhibit different developmental trajectories and be affected by different neural mechanisms. In the animal kingdom generally, learned, flexible vocal production is rare, appearing in only a few orders of birds and few species of mammals. Compared with humans, the majority of species produce a limited repertoire of calls that show little modification during development. Call usage is also highly constrained. Unlike humans, most animals use specific call types only in a limited range of contexts. In marked contrast to production and usage, animals' comprehension of vocalizations, as measured by their responses, are highly flexible, modifiable as a result of experience, and show the most parallels with human language. The differences among vocal production, usage, and comprehension create an oddly asymmetric system of communication in which a small repertoire of relatively fixed calls, each linked to a particular context, can nonetheless give rise to an open-ended, highly modifiable, and cognitively rich set of meanings. Recent studies of baboons and eavesdropping songbirds provide two examples. © 2009 Elsevier Inc.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Birds
  • Call production
  • Call usage
  • Mammals
  • Nonhuman primates
  • Response to calls (comprehension)
  • Vocal communication

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text

Authors

  • Robert M. Seyfarth

  • Dorothy L. Cheney

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free