Prognostic value of self-reported work ability and performance-based lifting tests for sustainable return to work among construction workers

42Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective This study aims to evaluate whether performance-based tests have additional prognostic value over self-reported work ability for sustainable return to work (RTW) in physically demanding work. Methods A one-year prospective cohort study was performed among 72 construction workers on sick leave for six weeks due to musculoskeletal disorders. The Work Ability Index (WAI) question regarding "current work ability" was used. Three dynamic lifting tests were used from a Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE). Sustainable RTW was the number of days on sick leave until the first day of returning fully to work for a period of ≥4 weeks. Regression models were built to calculate the prognostic values. Results Self-reported work ability alone predicted sustainable RTW (R=0.31, R2=0.09, P=0.009). In combination with one lifting test, the explained variance (R2) increased to 0.16 (P=0.001). Conclusion Combining self-reported work ability and a lifting test nearly doubled the explained variance for sustainable RTW in physically demanding work, although the strength remained modest.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kuijer, P. P. F. M., Gouttebarge, V., Wind, H., van Duivenbooden, C., Sluiter, J. K., & Frings-Dresen, M. H. W. (2012). Prognostic value of self-reported work ability and performance-based lifting tests for sustainable return to work among construction workers. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 38(6), 600–603. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3302

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free