Protein Interactions: Two Methods for Assessment of the Reliability of High Throughput Observations

  • Deane C
  • 1

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

High throughput methods for detecting protein interactions require assessment of their accuracy. We present two forms of computational assessment. The first method is the expression profile reliability (EPR) index. The EPR index estimates the biologically relevant fraction of protein interactions detected in a high throughput screen. It does so by comparing the RNA expression profiles for the proteins whose interactions are found in the screen with expression profiles for known interacting and non-interacting pairs of proteins. The second form of assessment is the paralogous verification method (PVM). This method judges an interaction likely if the putatively interacting pair has paralogs that also interact. In contrast to the EPR index, which evaluates datasets of interactions, PVM scores individual interactions. On a test set, PVM identifies correctly 40% of true interactions with a false positive rate of approximately 1%. EPR and PVM were applied to the Database of Interacting Proteins (DIP), a large and diverse collection of protein-protein interactions that contains over 8000 Saccharomyces cerevisiae pairwise protein interactions. Using these two methods, we estimate that approximately 50% of them are reliable, and with the aid of PVM we identify confidently 3003 of them. Web servers for both the PVM and EPR methods are available on the DIP website (dip.doe-mbi.ucla.edu/Services.cgi).

Author-supplied keywords

  • Algorithms
  • Databases as Topic
  • Fungal
  • Fungal Proteins
  • Fungal Proteins: chemistry
  • Genome
  • Protein Binding
  • Proteomics
  • Proteomics: methods
  • RNA
  • RNA: metabolism
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Saccharomyces cerevisiae
  • Saccharomyces cerevisiae: metabolism

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Charlotte M Deane

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free