Public Management Review

  • Routledge P
ISSN: 1471-9037
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article illuminates the relationship between the increased importance manage- ment has gained in public institutions, and political reality in everyday work lives. It attempts to gauge the rationalities behind the managerial and the political system and derives a heuristic structure from them. On the basis of this discussion, an analysis is conducted of the origins of new public management, using Switzerland as an ex- ample. It is concluded that NPM reforms started as managerial reforms of public institutions, but that they developed into de facto political reforms. Thus the managerial background of project managers, consultants and public management scholars is a necessary but not sufficient precondition for a successful implementation of NPM in the politico-administrative system. The contribu- tion which public management is able to make to the governance debate must not be underestimated. Not least, it leads to a clarification of the sources of legitimacy of government action. The rationality model introduced in this article is designed to make systemic differences between management and politics visible and to improve communication between politicians and pub- lic managers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Routledge, P. (2009). Public Management Review. Public Management Review, (773511694), 37–41.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free