Pulmonary emboli: The differential diagnosis dilemma

2Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Pulmonary embolism is a rare but serious medical condition, with an estimated mortality of 5% to 20%. Many patients receiving physical therapy may be at risk for developing pulmonary embolism, especially after periods of immobilization or surgery. Patients presenting with dyspnea, chest pain, or tachypnea, particularly after trauma or surgery, have an increased likelihood of pulmonary embolism. Clinical prediction rules have been developed, which can aid the practitioners in assessing the risk a patient has for developing pulmonary embolism. The present clinical commentary discusses the existing evidence for screening patients for pulmonary embolism. To illustrate the importance of the screening examination, a patient is presented who was referred to physical therapy 5 days after cervical discectomy and fusion. This patient was subsequently referred for medical evaluation and a confirmatory diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Young, B. A., & Flynn, T. W. (2005). Pulmonary emboli: The differential diagnosis dilemma. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy. Movement Science Media. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2005.35.10.637

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free