Pulsed versus continuous tones for evaluating the loudness of tinnitus.

  • Henry J
  • Meikle M
  • 13


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 13


    Citations of this article.


Loudness balance techniques are commonly employed to match the loudness of tinnitus using either pulsed or continuous tones; however, it is not known whether the tone duration affects the observed loudness matches. In this study, hearing thresholds and tinnitus loudness matches were measured in 26 subjects with chronic tinnitus using both pulsed and continuous tones. Subjects' thresholds and loudness matches were determined at 11 frequencies between 0.5 and 10 kHz. No significant differences were found between pulsed versus continuous measures, either for thresholds or for loudness matches. There were, however, nine subjects (34.5% of the group) who showed relatively large differences (> or =10 dB) at one or more test frequencies. These "outlier" values did not show systematic trends; some were positive, some negative. In conclusion, studies employing group data appear to be comparable if group sizes are sufficiently large (e.g., > or =25 subjects). Studies employing smaller numbers of subjects may, however, be vulnerable to potential positive or negative biases introduced by one or more outliers.

Author-supplied keywords

  • abbreviations
  • analysis of variance
  • anova
  • auditory dysfunc-
  • continuous
  • high-frequency hearing
  • intermittent
  • known to accom-
  • loudness
  • pany many forms of
  • pulsed
  • tinnitus
  • ubjective tinnitus is well

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

  • PMID: 10331618
  • PUI: 129425232
  • SGR: 0033126832
  • SCOPUS: 2-s2.0-0033126832
  • ISSN: 1050-0545


  • J a Henry

  • M B Meikle

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free