Quality measures for neurologists: Financial and practice implications

  • Cohen A
  • Sanders A
  • Swain-Eng R
 et al. 
  • 16


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 7


    Citations of this article.


Measuring and reporting health care quality is increasingly becoming part of clinical practice and reimbursement for specialists, including neurologists. The goal is to improve the value of care. Current major programs tie quality measurements to reimbursement, including programs from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services: the Physician Quality Reporting System, the Electronic Health Record Incentive Program (and Meaningful Use), and Accountable Care Organizations. Many specialty boards, including the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology, now require clinical practice quality measurements for maintenance of certification. Practitioners may find these programs confusing, overlapping, burdensome, and not clearly relevant to promoting better patient care. Yet, integrating quality metrics into practice has entered the mainstream and is increasingly tied to reimbursement. Further, over the next few years, most programs will switch from bonus incentives for participation to penalties for nonparticipation. This article aims to clarify current and rising quality measurement programs relevant to neurologists.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Adam B. Cohen

  • Amy E. Sanders

  • Rebecca J. Swain-Eng

  • Gina Gjorvad

  • Sarah T. Tonn

  • Christopher T. Bever

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free