Journal article

A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors.

Busemeyer J, Pothos E, Franco R, Trueblood J ...see all

Psychological Review, vol. 118, issue 2 (2011) pp. 193-218

  • 154

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 148

    Citations

    Citations of this article.
Sign in to save reference

Abstract

A quantum probability model is introduced and used to explain human probability judgment errors including the conjunction and disjunction fallacies, averaging effects, unpacking effects, and order effects on inference. On the one hand, quantum theory is similar to other categorization and memory models of cognition in that it relies on vector spaces defined by features and similarities between vectors to determine probability judgments. On the other hand, quantum probability theory is a generalization of Bayesian probability theory because it is based on a set of (von Neumann) axioms that relax some of the classic (Kolmogorov) axioms. The quantum model is compared and contrasted with other competing explanations for these judgment errors, including the anchoring and adjustment model for probability judgments. In the quantum model, a new fundamental concept in cognition is advanced--the compatibility versus incompatibility of questions and the effect this can have on the sequential order of judgments. We conclude that quantum information-processing principles provide a viable and promising new way to understand human judgment and reasoning.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text

Authors

  • Jerome R. Busemeyer

  • Emmanuel M. Pothos

  • Riccardo Franco

  • Jennifer S. Trueblood

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free