Radiofrequency ablation versus resection for resectable colorectal liver metastases: Time for a randomized trial? An update

  • Mulier S
  • Ruers T
  • Jamart J
 et al. 
  • 73

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 83

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A recent proposal of a randomized trial comparing resection and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in a selected subgroup of patients with small resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) has initiated a debate on this issue. Meanwhile, new data have been published. The aim of the study was to update and critically review the oncological evidence in favor of and against the use of RFA for resectable CRLM in general and in favor of and against conducting a randomized trial in a selected subgroup of patients. METHODS: An exhaustive review was carried out of papers and abstracts on RFA of colorectal metastases published before July 15, 2008. RESULTS: Local recurrence rate after resection of CRLM is 1.2-10.4%. Local recurrence rate after RFA of CRLM is between 1.7 and 66.7%. For tumors

Author-supplied keywords

  • Colorectal liver metastases
  • Radiofrequency
  • Randomized trial
  • Resection
  • Review

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free