Randomized controlled clinical trial of customized zirconia and titanium implant abutments for canine and posterior single-tooth implant reconstructions: Preliminary results at 1 year of function

147Citations
Citations of this article
215Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to test whether or not customized zirconia abutments exhibit the same survival rates in canine and posterior regions as titanium abutments, and to compare the esthetic result of the two abutment types. Material and methods: Twenty-two patients with 40 implants in posterior regions were included and the implant sites were randomly assigned to 20 customized zirconia and 20 customized titanium abutments. All-ceramic (AC) and metal-ceramic (MC) crowns were fabricated. In all except two cases, the crowns were cemented on the abutments using resin or glass-ionomer cements. Two zirconia reconstructions were screw retained. At baseline, 6 and 12 months, the reconstructions were examined for technical and biological problems. Probing pocket depth (PPD), plaque (Pl) and bleeding on probing (BOP) were assessed and compared with natural control teeth. Furthermore, the difference of color (ΔE) of the peri-implant mucosa and the gingiva of control teeth was evaluated by means of a spectrophotometer (Spectroshade). The data were analyzed with Student's unpaired t-test, ANOVA and regression analyses. Results: Twenty patients with 19 zirconia and 12 titanium abutments were examined at a mean follow-up of 12.6±2.7 months. The survival rate for reconstructions and abutments was 100%. No technical or biological problems were found at the test and control sites. Two chippings (16.7%) occurred at crowns supported by titanium abutments. No difference was found regarding PPD (meanPPD ZrO2 3.4±0.7 mm, mPPDTi 3.3±0.6 mm), Pl (mPlZrO2 0.2±0.3, mPlTi 0.1±1.8) and BOP (mBOPZrO2 60±30%, mBOPTi 30±40%) between the two groups. Both crowns on zirconia and titanium abutments induced a similar amount of discoloration of the soft tissue compared with the gingiva at natural teeth (ΔEZrO2 8.1±3.9, ΔETi 7.8±4.3). Conclusions: At 1 year, zirconia abutments exhibited the same survival and a similar esthetic outcome as titanium abutments. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sailer, I., Zembic, A., Jung, R. E., Siegenthaler, D., Holderegger, C., & Hämmerle, C. H. F. (2009). Randomized controlled clinical trial of customized zirconia and titanium implant abutments for canine and posterior single-tooth implant reconstructions: Preliminary results at 1 year of function. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 20(3), 219–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01636.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free