Reap Rewards: Maximizing Benefits From Reviewer Comments.

  • AGARWAL R
  • ECHAMBADI R
  • FRANCO A
 et al. 
  • 225

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

The authors detail how they handled a request to revise and resubmit an academic paper they had submitted for publication. The first order of business was to understand the reviewers' criticisms and allow for open expression among themselves of any emotional responses. Next they organized reviewers' comments according to area of concern and delegated responsibility among themselves for addressing them, with one person serving as an overall project manager. Once all reviewer comments were responded to in one fashion or another and the paper appropriately revised, the authors were able to resubmit it.

Author-supplied keywords

  • CRITICISM
  • KNOWLEDGE management
  • LEARNING & scholarship
  • LITERATURE reviews
  • METHODOLOGY
  • PEER review (Professional performance)
  • RESEARCH
  • RESEARCH teams
  • SCHOLARS
  • SOCIAL science research

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • RAJSHREE AGARWAL

  • R A J ECHAMBADI

  • APRIL M FRANCO

  • M B SARKAR

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free