Rearrest and Probation Violation Outcomes Among Probationers Participating in a Jail-Based Substance-Abuse Treatment Used as an Intermediate Sanction

  • Linhorst D
  • Dirks-Linhorst P
  • Groom R
  • 12


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 1


    Citations of this article.


This study compares the characteristics of two groups of probationers ordered to jail-based substance-abuse treatment as an intermediate sanction. It further reviews rearrest and probation failure outcomes of the two groups, along with the demographic, clinical, and criminal factors associated with those outcomes. Probationers jailed for probation violations had higher rates of rearrest and probation failure in the first year after program completion compared to probationers jailed immediately after conviction. Factors associated with rearrest and probation failure varied widely between the two outcomes and between the two probation groups. This study concludes that jail-based substance-abuse treatment should be an option in a range of intermediate sanctions and treatments for selected probationers. © 2012 Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.

Author-supplied keywords

  • intermediate sanctions
  • jail
  • probation
  • recidivism
  • substance abuse

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text


  • Donald M. Linhorst

  • P. Ann Dirks-Linhorst

  • Ralph Groom

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free