The relationship between percentage of singletons and sampling effort: A new approach to reduce the bias of richness estimates

23Citations
Citations of this article
88Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Estimate the richness of a community with accuracy despite differences in sampling effort is a key aspect to monitoring high diverse ecosystems. We compiled a worldwide multitaxa database, comprising 185 communities, in order to study the relationship between the percentage of species represented by one individual (singletons) and the intensity of sampling (number of individuals divided by the number of species sampled). The database was used to empirically adjust a correction factor to improve the performance of non-parametrical estimators under conditions of low sampling effort. The correction factor was tested on seven estimators (Chao1, Chao2, Jack1, Jack2, ACE, ICE and Bootstrap). The correction factor was able to reduce the bias of all estimators tested under conditions of undersampling, while converging to the original uncorrected values at higher intensities. Our findings led us to recommend the threshold of 20 individuals/species, or less than 21% of singletons, as a minimum sampling effort to produce reliable richness estimates of high diverse ecosystems using corrected non-parametric estimators. This threshold rise for 50 individuals/species if non-corrected estimators are used which implies in an economy of 60% of sampling effort if the correction factor is used. © 2011 Elsevier Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lopez, L. C. S., De Aguiar Fracasso, M. P., Mesquita, D. O., Palma, A. R. T., & Riul, P. (2012). The relationship between percentage of singletons and sampling effort: A new approach to reduce the bias of richness estimates. Ecological Indicators, 14(1), 164–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.07.012

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free