Journal article

Reliability and validity of communication skills questionnaire (CSQ)

Takahashi M, Tanaka K, Miyaoka H ...see all

Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, vol. 60, issue 2 (2006) pp. 211-218

  • 28


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 11


    Citations of this article.
Sign in to save reference


A new and easy evaluation method of communication skills has been developed using the Communication Skills Questionnaire (CSQ), which can be self-administered or administered by family members and medical staff. The reliability and validity of this CSQ were evaluated. Eighty-seven patients with mental disorders and 100 normal controls participated in a self-rating evaluation of the CSQ, and 55 family members and four medical personnel also participated in objective rating. The CSQ contained 29 items and these items were divided into three categories: cooperative skills (17 items), assertive skills (six items) and general communication skills (six items, mainly non-verbal skills). Internal consistencies of all groups were between 0.91 and 0.97. Test-retest reliability values for patients, family members and medical staff were between 0.90 and 0.95. Interrater reliability of medical staff was 0.73. The total scores had a moderate positive correlation with Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) score and doctor's impression of communication skill evaluated on a 10-point scale. The patient group had a lower CSQ score than that of controls and the score differences between controls and patients with schizophrenia, mood disorders or eating disorders were statistically significant. This questionnaire is a good psychometric method of evaluating the communication skills of patients.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Communication skill
  • Eating disorder
  • Mood disorder
  • Neurotic disorder
  • Schizophrenia
  • Social skills training

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text


  • Megumi Takahashi

  • Katsutoshi Tanaka

  • Hitoshi Miyaoka

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free