Response to Commentaries on "multiple Arousal Theory and Daily-Life Electrodermal Activity Asymmetry"

  • Picard R
  • Fedor S
  • Ayzenberg Y
  • 210


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 2


    Citations of this article.


We respond to the commentaries of Critchley and Nagai, Mendes, Norman, Sabatinelli, and Richter. We agree that a theory needs to make predictions and we elaborate on the predictions we made so far. We do not agree that arousal has to have a precise definition in order to present theory about it; however, we do provide concrete answers to questions raised about multiple arousal theory.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Electrodermal activity (EDA)
  • Emotional arousal
  • Sympathetic nervous system (SNS)

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free