Retesting in selection: A meta-analysis of coaching and practice effects for tests of cognitive ability

  • Hausknecht J
  • Halpert J
  • Di Paolo N
 et al. 
  • 178

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 154

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Previous studies have indicated that as many as 25% to 50% of applicants in organizational and educational settings are retested with measures of cognitive ability. Researchers have shown that practice effects are found across measurement occasions such that scores improve when these applicants retest. In this study, the authors used meta-analysis to summarize the results of 50 studies of practice effects for tests of cognitive ability. Results from 107 samples and 134,436 participants revealed an adjusted overall effect size of .26. Moderator analyses indicated that effects were larger when practice was accompanied by test coaching and when identical forms were used. Additional research is needed to understand the impact of retesting on the validity inferences drawn from test scores.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Cognitive ability testing
  • Meta-analysis
  • Personnel selection
  • Practice effects

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • John P. Hausknecht

  • Jane A. Halpert

  • Nicole T. Di Paolo

  • Meghan O. Moriarty Gerrard

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free