Retrospective review of the preoperative biliary and gastrointestinal evaluation for gastric bypass surgery

33Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to analyze the frequency and results of preoperative biliary and gastrointestinal (GI) evaluation of patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Methods: Retrospective review of the preoperative evaluation of 144 consecutive RYGB patients. Results: Cholecystectomy had already been performed in 43 (30%) patients; 22% of those patients with an intact gallbladder had cholelithiasis. Ten patients (7%) had an upper GI x-ray (UGI), and 94 patients (65%) had an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Abnormalities were found in 40% of the UGIs and 84% of the EGDs. A total of 96 patients (67%) were tested for Helicobacter pylori; 11% were positive. Twenty-one patients (15%) underwent preoperative colonoscopy; 48% were abnormal, but most of the abnormalities were not clinically significant. Three patients had barium enema x-ray, which was normal in all cases. Conclusions: The preoperative biliary and GI evaluation of bariatric surgery patients should include a routine ultrasound of the gallbladder. Routine preoperative EGD will detect a significant number of abnormalities that should be treated, but should rarely alter the bariatric surgical procedure or result in denial of bariatric surgery. Many abnormalities will be asymptomatic. Patients should be routinely screened for H. pylori and, if positive, treated before bariatric surgery. Lower GI evaluation should be performed selectively based on the patient's symptoms, physical findings, and guidelines for colorectal cancer and polyp screening. © 2006 American Society for Bariatric Surgery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vanek, V. W., Catania, M., Triveri, K., & Woodruff, R. W. (2006). Retrospective review of the preoperative biliary and gastrointestinal evaluation for gastric bypass surgery. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 2(1), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2005.10.004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free