Revenge without responsibility? Judgments about collective punishment in baseball

  • Cushman F
  • Durwin A
  • Lively C
  • 52

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 11

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Many cultures practice collective punishment; that is, they will punish one person for another's transgression, based solely on shared group membership. This practice is difficult to reconcile with the theories of moral responsibility that dominate in contemporary Western psychology, philosophy and law. Yet, we demonstrate a context in which many American participants do endorse collective punishment: retaliatory "beaning" in baseball. Notably, individuals who endorse this form of collective punishment tend not to hold the target of retaliation to be morally responsible. In other words, the psychological mechanisms underlying such "vicarious" forms of collective punishment appear to be distinct from the evaluation of moral responsibility. Consequently, the observation of collective punishment in non-Western cultures may not indicate the operation of fundamentally different conceptions of moral responsibility. © 2012 Elsevier Inc..

Author-supplied keywords

  • Collective punishment
  • Culture of honor
  • Morality
  • Responsibility

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Fiery Cushman

  • A. J. Durwin

  • Chaz Lively

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free