Review of the Day Reconstruction Method (DRM)

  • Diener E
  • Tay L
  • 80

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 24

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

The Day Reconstruction Method (DRM) for assessing daily experience and subjective well-being is reviewed. The DRM is a promising method as it assesses feelings within situations and activities, and therefore goes beyond asking who is happy to asking when they are happy. The technique might be less burdensome on respondents than experience-sampling, and might reduce memory biases that are inherent in global recall of feelings. However, evidence for the validity and reliability of the DRM is limited and is not entirely supportive. Research is needed on the psychometrics of the DRM, for example by comparing it to mobile phone assessments and other forms of experience-sampling, as well as to global reports of feelings in situations. Conceptual issues with computing overall subjective well-being by weighting a respondent’s activity scores by the time spent in them are discussed. Despite the promises of the DRM, the many unresolved issues with it and the alternative of using on-line electronic experience-sampling techniques suggest that more research is needed before the value of the DRM is established. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved) (journal abstract)

Author-supplied keywords

  • Affect
  • Day Reconstruction Method
  • Ecological momentary assessment
  • Experience sampling
  • Happiness
  • Measurement
  • Reliability
  • Subjective well-being
  • Validity

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Ed Diener

  • Louis Tay

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free