Journal article

A review of malaria diagnostic tools: Microscopy and rapid diagnostic test (RDT)

Wongsrichanalai C, Barcus M, Muth S, Sutamihardja A, Wernsdorfer W ...see all

American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 77, issue SUPPL. 6 (2007) pp. 119-127

  • 589


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 357


    Citations of this article.
Sign in to save reference


Objective: Microscopic detection of parasites has been the reference standard for malaria diagnosis for decades. However, difficulty in maintaining required technical skills and infrastructure has spurred the development of non-microscopic malaria rapid diagnostic devices based on the detection of malaria parasite antigen. We evaluated the QDx MALARIA PAN/Pf rapid immunochromatograpic card test by comparing it with the conventional standard blood smear method for the detection of malaria. Material & Methods: A total of 325 specimens of blood from cases of fever (falciparum malaria 88, vivax malaria 168, mixed infection of falciparum and vivax malaria 44, controls 25) were investigated by QDx Malaria Rapid test and blood smear method. Results: The QDx Malaria Rapid test showed 96.6% sensitivity, 100% specificity and 96.9 % accuracy. However, these parameters were lower when the parasitaemia was less than 500 parasites /μL. Conclusion: QDx Malaria Rapid test was found to have enormous advantages over smear examination due to its high degree of sensitivity, specificity, speed and ease of performance.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text


  • Chansuda Wongsrichanalai

  • Mazie J. Barcus

  • Sinuon Muth

  • Awalludin Sutamihardja

  • Walther H. Wernsdorfer

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free