Is the richness of our visual world an illusion? Transsaccadic memory for complex scenes.

136Citations
Citations of this article
92Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Our construction of a stable visual world, despite the presence of saccades, is discussed. A computer-graphics method was used to explore transsaccadic memory for complex images. Images of real-life scenes were presented under four conditions: they stayed still or moved in an unpredictable direction (forcing an eye movement), while simultaneously changing or staying the same. Changes were the appearance, disappearance, or rotation of an object in the scene. Subjects detected the changes easily when the image did not move but when it moved their performance fell to chance. A grey-out period was introduced to mimic that which occurs during a saccade. This also reduced performance but not to chance levels. These results reveal the poverty of transsaccadic memory for real-life complex scenes. They are discussed with respect to Dennett's view that much less information is available in vision than our subjective impression leads us to believe. Our stable visual world may be constructed out of a brief retinal image and a very sketchy, higher-level representation along with a pop-out mechanism to redirect attention. The richness of our visual world is, to this extent, an illusion.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Blackmore, S. J., Brelstaff, G., Nelson, K., & Trościanko, T. (1995). Is the richness of our visual world an illusion? Transsaccadic memory for complex scenes. Perception, 24(9), 1075–1081. https://doi.org/10.1068/p241075

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free