Risk management and precaution: Insights on the cautious use of evidence

  • Hrudey S
  • Leiss W
  • 29

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 57

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Risk management, done well, should be inherently precautionary. Adopting an appropriate degree of precaution with respect to feared health and environmental hazards is fundamental to risk management. The real problem is in deciding how precautionary to be in the face of inevitable uncertainties, demanding that we understand the equally inevitable false positives and false negatives from screening evidence. We consider a framework for detection and judgment of evidence of well-characterized hazards, using the concepts of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value that are well established for medical diagnosis. Our confidence in predicting the likelihood of a true danger inevitably will be poor for rare hazards because of the predominance of false positives; failing to detect a true danger is less likely because false negatives must be rarer than the danger itself. Because most controversial environmental hazards arise infrequently, this truth poses a dilemma for risk management.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Complacency
  • False negatives
  • False positives
  • Futility
  • Positive predictive value
  • Zero risk

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Steve E. Hrudey

  • William Leiss

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free