Role of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal cancer

  • Adam I
  • Martin I
  • Finan P
 et al. 
  • 81


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 769


    Citations of this article.


Summary. Local recurrence after resection for rectal cancer remains common despite growing acceptance that inadequate local excision may be implicated. In a prospective study of 190 patients with rectal cancer, we examined the circumferential margin of excision of resected specimens fortumour presence, to examine its frequency and its relation to subsequent local recurrence. Tumour involvement of the circumferential margin was seen in 25% (35/141) of specimens for which the surgeon thought the resection was potentially curative, and in 36% (69/190) of all cases. After a median 5 years' follow-up (range 3·0-7·7 years), the frequency of local recurrence after potentially curative resection was 25% (95% Cl 18-33%). The frequency of local recurrence was significantly higher for patients who had had tumour involvement of the circumferential margin than for those without such involvement (78 [95% Cl 62-94] vs 10 [4-16]%). By Cox's regression analysis tumour involvement of the circumferential margin independently influenced both local recurrence (hazard ratio=12·2 [4·4-34·6]) and survival (3·2 [1·6-6·53]). These results show the importance of wide local excision during resection for rectal cancer, and the need for routine assessment of the circumferential margin to assess prognosis. © 1994.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • I. J. Adam

  • I. G. Martin

  • Pj Finan

  • D. Johnston

  • M. O. Mohamdee

  • N. Scott

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free