Role of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal cancer

941Citations
Citations of this article
153Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Summary. Local recurrence after resection for rectal cancer remains common despite growing acceptance that inadequate local excision may be implicated. In a prospective study of 190 patients with rectal cancer, we examined the circumferential margin of excision of resected specimens fortumour presence, to examine its frequency and its relation to subsequent local recurrence. Tumour involvement of the circumferential margin was seen in 25% (35/141) of specimens for which the surgeon thought the resection was potentially curative, and in 36% (69/190) of all cases. After a median 5 years' follow-up (range 3·0-7·7 years), the frequency of local recurrence after potentially curative resection was 25% (95% Cl 18-33%). The frequency of local recurrence was significantly higher for patients who had had tumour involvement of the circumferential margin than for those without such involvement (78 [95% Cl 62-94] vs 10 [4-16]%). By Cox's regression analysis tumour involvement of the circumferential margin independently influenced both local recurrence (hazard ratio=12·2 [4·4-34·6]) and survival (3·2 [1·6-6·53]). These results show the importance of wide local excision during resection for rectal cancer, and the need for routine assessment of the circumferential margin to assess prognosis. © 1994.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Adam, I. J., Martin, I. G., Finan, P., Johnston, D., Mohamdee, M. O., Scott, N., … Quirke, P. (1994). Role of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal cancer. The Lancet, 344(8924), 707–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(94)92206-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free