The roles of entitativity and essentiality in judgments of collective responsibility

  • Denson T
  • Lickel B
  • Curtis M
 et al. 
  • 86

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 57

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Two studies investigated the roles of entitativity and essentiality in judgments of collective responsibility. Analyses focused on four group types (i.e. intimacy groups, task groups, social categories, and loose associations). Repeated measures analyses revealed that intimacy groups and task groups were rated highest in entitativity while intimacy groups and social categories were rated highest in essentiality. Correlational analyses revealed that entitativity played a more central role in judgments of collective responsibility for all four group types. However, tests of interaction effects revealed that essentiality moderated the effect of entitativity on blame judgments. Implications of the role of collective responsibility in intergroup relations are discussed.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Collective responsibility
  • Entitativity
  • Essentialism
  • Intergroup relations
  • Lay theories

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Thomas F. Denson

  • Brian Lickel

  • Mathew Curtis

  • Douglas M. Stenstrom

  • Daniel R. Ames

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free