Scientific Realism and Historical Evidence: Shortcomings of the Current State of Debate

  • Saatsi J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper discusses three shortcomings of the current state of the debate regarding historical evidence against scientific realism. Attend- ing to these issues will direct the debate away from over-generalising wholesale arguments.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saatsi, J. (2012). Scientific Realism and Historical Evidence: Shortcomings of the Current State of Debate. In EPSA Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009 (pp. 329–340). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2404-4_28

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free