(Self) Regulating war?: Voluntary regulation and the private security industry

  • de Nevers R
  • 16


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 12


    Citations of this article.


Private security companies’ growing participation in U . S . and in- ternational military missions has raised concern about whether the private security industry is subject to sufficient controls. Industry self-regulation is often proposed as part of a multilayered frame- work of regulations to govern PSC s. But what can self-regulation contribute to regulation of the private security industry? This mat- ters because privatization in the security realm has moved beyond understandings of the proper breakdown of public and private functions concerning the use of force. This article assesseswhat self- regulation cancontribute to the control of this industry andwhether the private security industry lends itself to effective self-regulation. It concludes that the private security industry does not exhibit the ca- pacity to adopt and implement effective self-regulation on its own. If self-regulation is to complement state and international regulation, participation in the design and oversight of self-regulation must be broadened beyond private security companies alone.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Renée de Nevers

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free