Can semantic relatedness explain the enhancement of memory for emotional words?

  • Talmi D
  • Moscovitch M
  • 117


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 122


    Citations of this article.


Memory for emotional items is often better than memory for neutral items. In three experiments, we examined whether this typical finding is due to the higher semantic relatedness inherent to emotional items, a confound in previous studies. We also controlled for other possible confounding variables, such as imagery. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants encoded lists of emotional and categorized neu-tral words equivalent in semantic relatedness, as well as lists of random neutral words with lower se-mantic relatedness. In Experiment 3, the lists were mixed, containing words from all the conditions. Surprise free recall was tested after a 40- to 55-min retention interval. Free recall of emotional words was better than that of random neutral words, replicating the classic effect. Importantly, categorized words were recalled better than random neutral words, and not worse than emotional words. These results em-phasize the important role of semantic relatedness in the classic effect and suggest that organizationalprocesses operate alongside arousal-related ones to enhance memory for emotional material.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free