Do semantic standards lack quality? A survey among 34 semantic standards

  • Folmer E
  • Luttighuis P
  • Van Hillegersberg J
  • 51


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 11


    Citations of this article.


The adoption of standards to improve interoperability in the automotive, aerospace, shipbuilding and other sectors could save billions. While interoperability standards have been created for a number of industries, problems persist, suggesting a lack of quality of the standards themselves. The issue of semantic standard quality is not often addressed. In this research we take a closer look at the quality of semantics standards, development processes, and survey the current state of the quality of semantic standards by means of a questionnaire that was sent to standards developers. This survey looked at 34 semantic standards, and it shows that the quality of semantic standards for inter-organizational interoperability can be improved. Improved standards may advance interoperability in networked business. Improvement of semantic standards requires transparency of their quality. Although many semantic standard development organisations already have quality assurance in place, this research shows that they could benefit from a quality measuring instrument.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Adoption
  • Interoperability
  • Networked business
  • Quality
  • Semantic standards

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text


  • Erwin Folmer

  • Paul Oude Luttighuis

  • Jos Van Hillegersberg

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free