Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science? A critical review

462Citations
Citations of this article
689Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article considers 3 claims that cognitive sex differences account for the differential representation of men and women in high-level careers in mathematics and science: (a) males are more focused on objects from the beginning of life and therefore are predisposed to better learning about mechanical systems; (b) males have a profile of spatial and numerical abilities producing greater aptitude for mathematics; and (c) males are more variable in their cognitive abilities and therefore predominate at the upper reaches of mathematical talent. Research on cognitive development in human infants, preschool children, and students at all levels fails to support these claims. Instead, it provides evidence that mathematical and scientific reasoning develop from a set of biologically based cognitive capacities that males and females share. These capacities lead men and women to develop equal talent for mathematics and science. Copyright 2005 by the American-Psychological Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Spelke, E. S. (2005, December). Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science? A critical review. American Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.9.950

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free