Journal article

Simulation of nitrate, sulfate, and ammonium aerosols over the United States

Walker J, Philip S, Martin R, Seinfeld J ...see all

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, vol. 12, issue 22 (2012) pp. 11213-11227

  • 45


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 49


    Citations of this article.
Sign in to save reference


Atmospheric concentrations of inorganic gases and aerosols (nitrate, sulfate, and ammonium) are simulated for 2009 over the United States using the chemical trans-port model GEOS-Chem. Predicted aerosol concentrations are compared with surface-level measurement data from the Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environ-ments (IMPROVE), the Clean Air Status and Trends Net-work (CASTNET), and the California Air Resources Board (CARB). Sulfate predictions nationwide are in reasonably good agreement with observations, while nitrate and ammo-nium are over-predicted in the East and Midwest, but under-predicted in California, where observed concentrations are the highest in the country. Over-prediction of nitrate in the East and Midwest is consistent with results of recent studies, which suggest that nighttime nitric acid formation by hetero-geneous hydrolysis of N 2 O 5 is over-predicted based on cur-rent values of the N 2 O 5 uptake coefficient, γ , onto aerosols. After reducing the value of γ by a factor of 10, predicted ni-trate levels in the US Midwest and East still remain higher than those measured, and over-prediction of nitrate in this region remains unexplained. Comparison of model predic-tions with satellite measurements of ammonia from the Tro-pospheric Emissions Spectrometer (TES) indicates that am-monia emissions in GEOS-Chem are underestimated in Cal-ifornia and that the nationwide seasonality applied to ammo-nia emissions in GEOS-Chem does not represent California very well, particularly underestimating winter emissions. An ammonia sensitivity study indicates that GEOS-Chem sim-ulation of nitrate is ammonia-limited in southern California and much of the state, suggesting that an underestimate of ammonia emissions is likely the main cause for the under-prediction of nitrate aerosol in many areas of California. An approximate doubling of ammonia emissions is needed to re-produce observed nitrate concentrations in southern Califor-nia and in other ammonia sensitive areas of California. How-ever, even a tenfold increase in ammonia emissions yields predicted nitrate concentrations that are still biased low in the central valley of California. The under-prediction of nitrate aerosol in the central valley of California may arise in part from an under-prediction of both ammonia and nitric acid in this region. Since nitrate aerosols are particularly sensitive to mixed layer depths, owing to the gas-particle equilibrium, the nitrate under-prediction could also arise in part from a po-tential regional overestimate of GEOS-5 mixed layer depths in the central valley due to unresolved topography in this re-gion.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text


  • J. M. Walker

  • S. Philip

  • R. V. Martin

  • J. H. Seinfeld

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free