On some recent claims for the efficacy of cognitive therapy for people with intellectual disabilities

  • Emerson E
  • Sturmey P
  • 1

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Sturmey (2005)argues that the evidence base underlying approaches to intervention based on applied behavioural analysis (ABA) are significantly stronger than that underlying approaches to intervention based on cognitive therapy. He concludes that ‘the ethical imperative of beneficence requires that people, including people with ID, receive known effective treatments. Those effective treatments are based on ABA’ (p. X). In this commentary, I argue that his selection of evidence to support the central argument (the superiority of ABA) involves some highly contestable assumptions and that evidence of the effectiveness of ABA falls far short of that required for evidence-based policy and practice.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Applied behaviour analysis
  • Cognitive therapy
  • Evidence-based practice
  • applied behaviour analysis
  • cognitive therapy
  • evidence-based practice

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Eric Emerson

  • P Sturmey

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free