The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A rebuttal to critics

  • Gambino B
  • Lesieur H
  • 11


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A


    Citations of this article.


A review of the literature reveals strong support for the construct validity of interpretations based on scores obtained with the original and more recent versions and/or variants of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS). Criticisms of the SOGS are shown to lack merit, to be offset by more important criteria, or to be no longer relevant. The evidence reviewed indicates that the construct of pathological gambling as represented by the SOGS and its variants provides a robust definition and implies that the SOGS meets the important criterion of validity generalization. The construct of chasing and behaviors related to chasing is shown to provide powerful measures by which to discriminate between the presence and absence of pathological gambling. The viability of the SOGS to continue to make important contributions to the understanding of pathological gambling is discussed in terms of the criteria for selecting a research instrument. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved) (journal abstract)

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Blasé Gambino

  • Henry Lesieur

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free