Sparing from the attentional blink is not spared from structural limitations

  • Dell'Acqua R
  • Dux P
  • Wyble B
 et al. 
  • 31


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 24


    Citations of this article.


When a series of three successive to-be-reported items (targets) is displayed in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) stream of distractors, it has been shown that no attentional blink--a marked impairment in the report of the second of two targets, typically observed when the targets appear within 200-600 ms of one another--occurs in target accuracy. The present study examines three recently introduced computational models that provide different explanations of this protracted sparing effect. Using a standard RSVP design and these models, we provide empirical data and simulations that illustrate that structural limitations affect the processing of successive targets. In addition, we compare the candidate mechanisms that might underlie these limitations.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Attention systems
  • Attentional blink
  • Cognitive and attentional control
  • Computational modeling

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free