Species relationships in the genus Vasconcellea (Caricaceae) based on molecular and morphological evidence

  • Kyndt T
  • Romeijn-Peeters E
  • Van Droogenbroeck B
 et al. 
  • 22

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 27

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Validity of the taxa currently recognized in the genus Vasconcellea was analyzed by investigating morphological and molecular data from 105 specimens of this genus and six specimens of the related genus Carica. Taxon identification of these specimens was compared with clustering in two phenetic dendrograms generated with 36 morphological characters and 254 amplified fragment length polymorphic (AFLP) markers. Moreover, cytoplasmic haplotypes were assessed using polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) of one mitochondrial and two chloroplast DNA regions. Results show that the morphological data set, containing mainly vegetative characteristics, merely reveals external resemblance between specimens, which is not directly associated with genetic relationships and taxon validity. Phenotypic plasticity and intercompatibility between several species are likely to confuse morphological delimitation of the taxa. Based on the results of our study, several specimens that could not be identified with the currently used identification key (1) could be attributed to a known taxon, which should be extended to include a higher range of morphological variability or (2) could be hypothesized to be of hybrid origin. Because of the high intraspecific variation within V. microcarpa and V. × heilbornii, revision of these taxa is recommended.

Author-supplied keywords

  • AFLP
  • Carica
  • Hybridization
  • Morphological variability
  • PCR-RFLP
  • Phenetic relationships
  • Species separation
  • Vasconcellea

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Tina Kyndt

  • Eliza Romeijn-Peeters

  • Bart Van Droogenbroeck

  • José P. Romero-Motochi

  • Godelieve Gheysen

  • Paul Goetghebeur

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free