Statistical reporting deficiencies in environmental toxicology

8Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Null hypothesis significance testing is one of the most widely used forms of statistical testing in environmental toxicology. In this short communication, the authors show that the reporting of statistical information when using null hypothesis significance testing is frequently inadequate in environmental toxicology research. The authors demonstrate this by analyzing the statistical information reported for papers employing t tests or analyses of variance in the Environmental Toxicology section of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry in 2010, which comprised 68% of papers published by this journal in that year. Of these papers, 60% fail to report exact p values, 85% fail to provide degrees of freedom, and 90% fail to report critical effect sizes. Statistical power was reported in only <2% of the published papers. The insufficient provision of statistical information makes interpretation of study results by reviewers and readers difficult. Consistently reporting exact p values with degrees of freedom, considering and explicitly stating biologically relevant critical effect sizes, and reporting statistical power associated with nonsignificant results would be easy to implement and would promote scientific progress in environmental toxicology through increased statistical transparency. © 2013 SETAC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bosker, T., Mudge, J. F., & Munkittrick, K. R. (2013). Statistical reporting deficiencies in environmental toxicology. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 32(8), 1737–1739. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.2226

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free