A strategy to identify critical appraisal criteria for primary mixed-method studies

  • Sale J
  • Brazil K
  • 106


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 56


    Citations of this article.


The practice of mixed-methods research has increased considerably over the last 10 years. While these studies have been criticized for violating quantitative and qualitative paradigmatic assumptions, the methodological quality of mixed-method studies has not been addressed. The purpose of this paper is to identify criteria to critically appraise the quality of mixed-method studies in the health literature. Criteria for critically appraising quantitative and qualitative studies were generated from a review of the literature. These criteria were organized according to a cross-paradigm framework. We recommend that these criteria be applied to a sample of mixed-method studies which are judged to be exemplary. With the consultation of critical appraisal experts and experienced qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method researchers, further efforts are required to revise and prioritize the criteria according to importance.

Author-supplied keywords

  • critical appraisal
  • mixed methods
  • multiple methods
  • qualitative methods
  • quantitative methods

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text


  • Joanna E.M. Sale

  • Kevin Brazil

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free