STS and the City: Politics and practices of hope

116Citations
Citations of this article
212Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Many recent studies on network technologies and cities share an alarmist view of the impact of technological or regulatory change in utility sectors on the social and spatial fabric of cities, pointing to growing discrimination and inequalities, alienation, enhanced social exclusion and urban "splintering" on a universal scale. A science and technology study (STS) perspective on these matters is helpful in moving beyond this "universal alarmism" by emphasizing the ambivalence inherent to all technologies, the significant potential of contestation of, and resistance, to technology-supported forms of discrimination, and the deeply contingent nature of the process of appropriation of new technologies and, as a consequence, of the social "effects" of technologies. Adopting this perspective would mean actively searching for and exploring these context-dependent and often conflictive appropriation processes. For it is in these spaces that we might begin to identify urban technological politics that break free from an intellectually and politically disabling technological pessimism. © 2007 Sage Publications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Coutard, O., & Guy, S. (2007). STS and the City: Politics and practices of hope. Science Technology and Human Values, 32(6), 713–734. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907303600

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free