Stuck in transit: Secondary migration of asylum seekers in Europe, national differences, and the dublin regulation

  • Brekke J
  • Brochmann G
  • 91


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 10


    Citations of this article.


The European Union’s ambition to create a harmonized reception system for asylum seekers differs from the realities on the ground. We address how differences in national reception conditions stimulate the secondary migration that challenges the creation of an effective common migration regulation in Europe. We base our analysis on the Dublin Regulation (DR) and the secondary movement of Eritrean asylum seekers from Italy to Norway. The empirical material consists of qualitative interviews with civil servants, NGO representatives, and Eritrean migrants in Milan and Rome, and Norwegian civil servants. Recently developed models of migration destination selection were used to analyse the interaction between individual aspirations and structural constraints. We found that the Eritrean informants remained highly motivated to apply in a second country but were to some extent held back by the DR. Supranational regulations were challenged by the migrants’ actions and by national differences in reception and welfare standards. Both the migrants’ aspirations to move on and the challenges to a harmonized regional regulation of migration increased during times of economic crisis.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Asylum seekers
  • Common european asylum system
  • Destination selection
  • Dublin regulation
  • Eritreans
  • Italy
  • Migration
  • Norway
  • Secondary migration

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text


  • Jan Paul Brekke

  • Grete Brochmann

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free