A Study of Search Result Clustering Interfaces: Comparing Textual and Zoomable User Interfaces

  • Rivadeneira W
  • Bederson B
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

There have been several studies that compare sequential search results versus clustered search results, and graphical presentations versus textual presentations. These studies have resulted in confirmed efficiency and preference of clustering over sequential lists. The studies between graphical and textual presentations have usually shown to be task dependant. This study shows a systematic evaluation of zoomable versus textual clustered search results. A controlled experiment with repeated measures design and within-subjects differences was performed with fifteen subjects, comparing Groxis, Inc.s Grokker their clustering product a zoomable user interface, their textual clustering product and Vivisimos textual clustering product. No significant differences were found for objective measures. However, there were significant differences for subjective measures. The textual clustering interfaces was preferred and elicited major satisfaction among the users. Results are summarized in both a quantitative and qualitative format.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rivadeneira, W., & Bederson, B. B. (2003). A Study of Search Result Clustering Interfaces: Comparing Textual and Zoomable User Interfaces. Studies, 21, 5. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.66.6533&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free